New Bill Introduced To ‘Disarm the IRS’

U.S. Representative Barry Moore (R-AL) has introduced a new piece of legislation that has ignited both praise and controversy: the Why Does the IRS Need Guns Act. As reported in Moore’s official press release, this bill aims to strip the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of all firearms and ammunition, prohibit future acquisitions, and liquidate the agency’s stockpiles to licensed dealers and the general public. “The only thing IRS agents should be armed with are calculators,” Moore stated, underscoring the bill’s message of demilitarizing what many Americans view as a civilian tax agency.

What the Bill Proposes

According to 1819 News reporter Caleb Taylor, the bill includes four primary mandates: it prohibits the IRS from purchasing, receiving, or storing any firearms or ammunition; requires the transfer of all existing guns and ammo to the General Services Administration (GSA); compels GSA to sell or auction the firearms to Federal Firearm Licensees (FFLs) and the ammunition to the public; and moves the IRS’s Criminal Investigation Division under the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice (DOJ). Moore emphasized that this is not about disbanding enforcement entirely, but rather ensuring any criminal activity is handled by agencies like the DOJ – agencies that are meant for that purpose.

$10 Million in Tactical Gear and Firearms Since 2020

Moore cited a staggering number that helped drive his effort: since 2020, the IRS has spent over $10 million on guns, ammo, body armor, and combat equipment. This number is verified by watchdog reports and was echoed across platforms like Liberty Doll, 2A News Now, and Langley Outdoors Academy. In her coverage, Liberty Doll broke down those purchases, listing over $2 million on ammunition, nearly half a million dollars on tactical shotguns, rifles, and ballistic gear – raising the question, “Why is a tax agency stockpiling like a SWAT team?”

Concerns Over Government Weaponization

The underlying concern behind Moore’s bill is what he describes as the weaponization of government. In his interview with 1819 News, Moore explained that his constituents were alarmed after the IRS expanded its enforcement posture following the hiring of 87,000 new agents under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Moore said, “The fear was palpable… IRS agents who really just have civil responsibilities shouldn’t be raiding homes like a SWAT team.” That sentiment is reflected in the bill’s effort to move the IRS’s criminal enforcement functions to the DOJ.

Gun Rights Channels Applaud the Effort

Gun rights media wasted no time analyzing the bill. On Langley Outdoors Academy, host Braden Langley called the legislation “a step in the right direction,” noting that the IRS could be one of the 50 largest police forces in the country based on the number of armed agents alone. Langley criticized the agency’s bloated armory, which has grown over the years into what he described as “a paramilitary stockpile.” Though skeptical of the bill’s long-term prospects in Congress, he said it would at least bring attention to an issue that has festered for decades.

Criticism Of Government Overreach And Misuse Of Taxpayer Dollars

Across platforms, from Liberty Doll to 2A News Now, one theme remained consistent: frustration over the IRS’s use of taxpayer dollars to arm itself. Troy from 2A News Now questioned why any civilian agency – especially one tasked with revenue collection – should be acquiring millions of rounds of ammunition and high-powered firearms. He noted that if actual criminal enforcement is required, agencies like the FBI or DEA already exist to do that job. “No need for the IRS to look like a tactical unit,” he said.

Moore’s Message: Enough is Enough

Moore’s core message is simple. In his press release, he said: “The IRS has consistently been weaponized against American citizens… Arming these agents does not make the American public safer.” Moore’s co-sponsors – Representatives Mary Miller (R-IL), Harriet Hageman (R-WY), and Clay Higgins (R-LA) – echoed his concerns. Higgins put it bluntly: “IRS agents should not hit homes and businesses like SWAT teams.” The pushback isn’t just about firearms – it’s about the growing perception that civilian federal agencies are drifting too far into militarization.

Past Patterns of Political Targeting Feed Distrust

The bill also leans heavily into the IRS’s long-criticized history of political targeting. In both his press release and his comments to 1819 News, Moore referenced past investigations that revealed the agency had unfairly scrutinized conservative groups, religious organizations, and journalists. According to Moore, putting firearms into the hands of a politicized agency adds fuel to the fire of distrust. And in today’s environment, where tension between citizens and government is already high, adding weapons into that equation is, in his words, “dangerous.”

A Calculated Public Push or Symbolic Gesture?

Despite widespread support from the gun rights community, some skepticism remains about whether the bill has real teeth. On Langley Outdoors Academy, Langley admitted the bill could be seen as political “red meat” for conservative – a flashy gesture to show voters someone is doing something. “It’s a good step,” he said, “but it has only a few sponsors, and no real momentum yet in the Senate.” He warned viewers to stay alert for performative politics that never result in real change.

Liberty Doll’s Breakdown: The Numbers Don’t Lie

In her video, Liberty Doll offered a detailed look at just how much gear the IRS owns. From over 4,500 firearms – including pump-action shotguns, semi-automatic rifles, and even submachine guns – to tens of millions of rounds of ammunition, the agency’s arsenal is more robust than most local police departments. She raised concerns about whether the IRS is even the right agency to handle violent crime, given their lack of traditional law enforcement structure. “They can always call the FBI,” she said. “They don’t need to go full tactical.”

A Plan That Includes the Public

One of the more intriguing aspects of Moore’s proposal is how it repurposes the seized weapons and ammunition. Under the bill, all firearms would be auctioned to licensed gun dealers, and the ammunition would be sold directly to the public. Langley and others expressed cautious support for this, suggesting it could benefit everyday gun owners with lower prices and more availability – though there was concern about how the sales would be managed.

Is This the Start of Something Bigger?

To me, this bill represents something bigger than just the IRS – it’s a challenge to how much power unelected federal agencies can wield. Whether this bill passes or not, it forces a public conversation we should be having: why are civilian bureaucracies arming up like combat units? It’s easy to scoff at legislation like this as symbolic, but symbolic fights can be the spark that lights the real ones. If the American people are questioning the legitimacy of tax collectors with tactical rifles, maybe it’s time Washington starts listening.

A Bill With Bold Intentions

The Why Does the IRS Need Guns Act is still in its early stages, and while its passage is far from certain, it’s already achieving one goal: putting the spotlight on what many see as a bloated and increasingly aggressive federal government. From Representative Barry Moore to commentators like Braden Langley and Liberty Doll, the message is clear – government accountability starts with transparency, and no agency should have the authority to become its own armed force behind closed doors. Whether this turns into lasting reform or fades into political theater will depend on how much pressure the public applies next.