Gunmaker Sig Sauer has launched a major legal fight in Washington State, challenging a ban that keeps one of its most popular handguns out of police training academies. As reported by Chris Ingalls of KING 5 Seattle, the company filed suit last month in Thurston County court, demanding the court reverse the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission’s decision to ban the P320 pistol, as well as its M17 and M18 military variants.
Why the Commission Banned the P320
Ingalls explained that the academy’s ban began in March after repeated reports, some backed by video evidence, that the P320 could fire without anyone pulling the trigger. The decision covered every training facility run by the commission and has since forced police departments, including Bellevue, Kirkland, and Anacortes, to start replacing their duty guns with different models.
SIG Sauer’s Position
Sig Sauer says the ban is based on fear, not facts. In its lawsuit, the company argues that the P320 cannot fire on its own because of five internal safety mechanisms. It accuses the commission of acting on anecdotal reports and social media videos rather than scientific evidence. Ingalls reported that the company calls the action “unprecedented, unnecessary, and harmful to both law enforcement and Sig Sauer.”
The Lawsuit’s Broader Demands
According to Ingalls, the suit doesn’t just ask for the ban to be lifted. Sig Sauer also wants a court order to prevent the commission’s executive director from making public statements about the P320. The company argues that those comments damage its reputation in both law enforcement and commercial markets.
The Trigger for the Ban
One of the incidents that led to the ban was a training accident where a recruit’s P320 discharged during a firearms drill, even though instructors said his finger wasn’t on the trigger. That single shot injured another recruit and an instructor when fragments ricocheted off concrete. Jared Yanis, host of Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News, explained in his report that this event, combined with other uncommanded discharge allegations nationwide, pushed the commission to remove all P320s from its property.
A Death That Added Fuel
Ingalls also linked this controversy to a tragic event in Wyoming. Just days before Sig Sauer filed the lawsuit, 21-year-old Airman Brayden Lovan died at Francis E. Warren Air Force Base from a gunshot wound involving a military-issued M18 pistol, the same basic platform as the P320. The Air Force has not confirmed whether the pistol fired on its own, but Global Strike Command ordered its personnel to stop carrying the handgun until the investigation ends.
Guns & Gadgets: Why This Case Matters
In a detailed breakdown, Jared Yanis warned that the Washington case has implications far beyond one state. If the commission can impose a firearm ban without a legislative vote, he argued, nothing stops similar agencies from doing the same across the country. “If this is constitutional,” Yanis said, “then what’s to stop other state training agencies from banning firearms at will? And where does that leave the Second Amendment?”
Key Arguments From Sig Sauer
Yanis also examined the legal claims made by Sig Sauer’s lawyers. These include accusations that the commission’s ban violates Washington’s firearm preemption laws (because only the state legislature can regulate firearms), denies due process by ignoring Sig’s evidence, and imposes a costly burden on police departments. The company claims its reputation has been damaged by public comments painting the P320 as unsafe.
Police Departments Caught in the Middle
Ingalls reported that several agencies objected to the commission’s decision. Bellevue Police, for example, now face the cost of replacing not only firearms but also holsters, optics, lights, and training materials. That’s a bill that lands on taxpayers, not the academy. Yanis echoed these concerns, pointing out that departments are being forced to abandon a weapon that is standard issue for the U.S. Army and many other agencies.
Past Reports of Malfunctions
Critics of the P320 point to a long list of incidents, including lawsuits from officers who say the pistol discharged while holstered. Ingalls highlighted the case of a veteran Houston officer, Richard Fernandez Jr., who recently sued Sig Sauer after his P320 fired into his leg. Fernandez said he couldn’t believe he had been shot “by his own gun” while sitting in his police car.
SIG Sauer’s Defense
In its public statements, Sig Sauer maintains that no P320 can fire unless the trigger is pulled by a person or something inside the holster. Company representatives met with Washington’s review task force last year and gave demonstrations of the gun’s safety features. Yanis pointed out that the company has repeatedly argued that most unintentional discharges are due to user handling errors or interference from equipment like holsters, not mechanical flaws.
A Fight Over Process, Not Just Guns
This case, at its core, is about more than one pistol. It raises questions about who gets to make sweeping decisions that affect law enforcement across an entire state. It’s striking how quickly an agency decision has impacted budgets, officer training, and even public trust – all without a legislative vote. This slow procedural move, made by an appointed director, now stands to change the landscape of police training if courts uphold it.
How Far Does Authority Go?
The lawsuit shows the tension between caution and overreach. On one hand, you can see why safety concerns would lead to a temporary ban after an incident. On the other hand, the idea that an unelected commission can effectively blacklist a widely used gun without solid evidence or public accountability raises serious questions. That’s why this legal battle, while centered on a specific model, may become a much bigger conversation about oversight and constitutional rights.
What Happens Next
A hearing in Thurston County Superior Court is scheduled soon, where lawyers for Sig Sauer and the training commission will argue their sides. Both Ingalls and Yanis say that law enforcement agencies across the country are watching closely. The decision could set a precedent that affects not only Washington but potentially every state where police carry P320 pistols.
UP NEXT: “Heavily Armed” — See Which States Are The Most Strapped
Image Credit: Survival World
Americans have long debated the role of firearms, but one thing is sure — some states are far more armed than others. See where your state ranks in this new report on firearm ownership across the U.S.
The article Major Gun Manufacturer Sues Police first appeared on Survival World.
A former park ranger and wildlife conservationist, Lisa’s passion for survival started with her deep connection to nature. Raised on a small farm in northern Wisconsin, she learned how to grow her own food, raise livestock, and live off the land. Lisa is our dedicated Second Amendment news writer and also focuses on homesteading, natural remedies, and survival strategies. Lisa aims to help others live more sustainably and prepare for the unexpected.
