Gavin Newsom Accepts Gun as a Gift – Says He’s Not Anti-Gun

Recently, California Governor Gavin Newsom appeared on the Shawn Ryan Show, a popular podcast hosted by former Navy SEAL Shawn Ryan. During this interview, Newsom was unexpectedly gifted a California-compliant Sig Sauer P365 X-Macro, a compact handgun. The gesture sparked a firestorm of reactions across social media and news outlets, with many questioning the authenticity of Newsom’s stance on gun rights. 

Not Anti-Gun

In the clip, Newsom appeared genuinely surprised by the gift, expressing his gratitude but also joking about potential legal issues with TSA. He went on to state that he is “not anti-gun” but advocates for “common-sense” gun safety laws. Despite his reassuring words, the moment raised serious questions about the governor’s true views on firearms. As a politician known for pushing aggressive gun control laws in California, this exchange seemed contradictory to many, especially given his past record. 

A Tense Moment with a Gun Gift

The situation unfolded when Shawn Ryan, known for his in-depth interviews and occasional gifts for his guests, presented the Sig Sauer handgun to Newsom. The governor’s response was telling – he smiled, appreciated the gift, and assured Ryan that he was not anti-gun. He emphasized his belief in the right to bear arms but also mentioned his concerns about “large capacity magazine clips” and “weapons of war” that outgun law enforcement.

For some, Newsom’s acceptance of the gun, despite his staunch support for gun control measures, was puzzling. His public advocacy for restrictions like bans on assault weapons and efforts to increase taxes on firearms and ammunition raised eyebrows. The question remains: was this an authentic expression of respect for the Second Amendment, or a carefully crafted political move?

Colion Noir Calls It a Political Stunt

Colion Noir, a well-known gun rights activist and YouTuber, didn’t mince words when commenting on the incident. In his video, Noir emphasized that this wasn’t a moment of genuine change but rather a calculated move by Newsom to position himself as moderate ahead of a possible 2028 presidential run. He argued that the governor has spent years pushing anti-gun legislation and that his “common-sense” rhetoric is nothing more than a cover for policies that undermine Second Amendment rights.

Noir pointed to Newsom’s vocal support for a 28th Amendment that would impose nationwide gun control and his recent actions to make it harder for Californians to legally own firearms. According to Noir, Newsom’s acceptance of a gun on a podcast is just another example of politicians trying to rebrand themselves for broader appeal, particularly to centrist voters.

Newsom’s Stance: A Fine Line Between Support and Control

In his own words, Newsom said, “I’m for just some gun safety, common sense. I’m challenged by large capacity magazine clips in urban centers, weapons of war, sometimes outgunning the police, but otherwise, man, people have the right to bear arms”. These comments echo his longstanding position that he does not oppose gun ownership in principle but believes in stricter controls.

However, Newsom’s selective focus on “large capacity” magazines and “weapons of war” is problematic for gun advocates. By labeling certain firearms as “weapons of war,” he is following a common anti-gun talking point that undermines the legal right to own military-style rifles like the AR-15. Newsom’s preference for “common-sense” reforms seems more like an incremental approach to disarmament rather than a fair and balanced policy. His words may be well-rehearsed, but they only reinforce his commitment to stricter regulations.

Curtis Hallstrom Highlights the Hypocrisy

Curtis Hallstrom of the VSO Gun Channel also weighed in on the situation, pointing out the hypocrisy of Newsom accepting a California-compliant gun. While Newsom may have accepted the gift graciously, Hallstrom argues that the very fact that it was “California compliant” undermines the idea that Newsom truly respects gun rights. 

The term “California compliant” refers to modifications made to firearms to meet the stringent gun laws in the state, such as limiting magazine capacity. For Hallstrom, this highlights the broader issue of Newsom’s support for arbitrary restrictions on gun ownership that do little to address crime but serve as political talking points.

The Danger of Accepting Restrictions as Common Sense

Hallstrom’s critique underscores the danger of accepting these restrictions as “common sense.” Rather than addressing real problems, Newsom’s policies often place unnecessary burdens on lawful gun owners while failing to prevent violent crime. To Hallstrom, the acceptance of a firearm that complies with these restrictive laws only legitimizes the very system Newsom continues to support.

Braden Langley Warns Against Falling for Newsom’s Charisma

Braden Langley of Langley Outdoors Academy also critiqued Newsom’s move, warning against the rebranding efforts underway. Langley argued that Newsom’s appearance on The Shawn Ryan Show was part of a larger strategy to soften his image ahead of a presidential bid. By accepting the gun, Newsom positioned himself as someone who respects gun rights, at least on the surface.

Langley’s comments are particularly concerning for gun owners who fear that Newsom’s “common sense” reforms will pave the way for more significant restrictions nationwide. His smooth rhetoric and well-practiced demeanor allow him to appear moderate, even while pushing extreme gun control agendas. Langley warns that Newsom is using these moments to create the illusion of support for the Second Amendment, all while working behind the scenes to undermine it.

A Carefully Crafted Political Narrative

What makes Newsom’s acceptance of the gift so controversial is not just his words but the larger political narrative he is crafting. As Langley pointed out, Newsom is working hard to reframe himself as a moderate on gun issues in preparation for a possible 2028 presidential run. The carefully curated optics of him holding a firearm in a casual setting, thanking Ryan for the gift, and speaking favorably about responsible gun ownership are designed to appeal to undecided voters.

In a deeply polarized political climate, the image of a governor who supports gun rights, albeit with limitations, might resonate with moderates or those who feel that the gun debate is more about safety than rights. However, Newsom’s long record of advocating for gun control legislation calls into question whether this is truly a change of heart or simply a calculated move to widen his political appeal.

Newsom’s Real Agenda: More Gun Control

While Newsom’s words may have reassured some, his actions speak louder. His administration has been responsible for some of the most stringent gun control laws in the nation, including the recent push for a 28th Amendment to restrict gun rights nationwide. Additionally, his signing of laws that increase taxes on firearms and ammunition and encourage lawsuits against gun manufacturers only reinforces his stance on gun control.

Newsom’s repeated use of terms like “weapons of war” and his focus on banning certain types of firearms reveal his true intentions. Despite his claims of supporting responsible gun ownership, Newsom’s actions consistently lean toward restricting access to firearms rather than promoting responsible ownership. This discrepancy between his words and actions highlights the dangers of political manipulation in the gun rights debate.

The Message Newsom Is Sending to Voters

The real question is: what message is Newsom sending to voters? By accepting the gun, he may have convinced some that he is a reasonable figure, willing to engage with those who disagree with him. However, this gesture can also be seen as a ploy to gain credibility with a broader audience, while still adhering to his core belief that more gun control is necessary.

For gun rights advocates, this moment is a stark reminder that political figures often use optics to mask their true intentions. Newsom may have smiled and thanked Shawn Ryan, but his long-standing efforts to dismantle the Second Amendment are far from over.

A Moment of Political Theater

In the end, Newsom’s acceptance of the gun on The Shawn Ryan Show is a fascinating political moment. Whether it’s a genuine shift in his views or simply another example of political theater, one thing is clear: this event has sparked a renewed conversation about the future of gun rights in America. Newsom’s rhetoric may be more polished, but his record remains firmly anti-gun. We should be cautious not to fall for the narrative that Newsom is now a friend of the Second Amendment.

While Newsom’s acceptance of the gun may seem harmless on the surface, it’s essential to look beyond the optics and consider his overall record. As he continues to position himself for a 2028 presidential run, this moment may be just one of many calculated moves to reshape his image and shift the political narrative on gun rights.

UP NEXT: “Heavily Armed” — See Which States Are The Most Strapped

Americans have long debated the role of firearms, but one thing is sure — some states are far more armed than others.

See where your state ranks in this new report on firearm ownership across the U.S.

The article Gavin Newsom Accepts Gun as a Gift – Says He’s Not Anti-Gun first appeared on Survival World.