The Nevada State Legislature has passed Assembly Bill 245 (AB245), a sweeping piece of legislation that aims to raise the legal age to purchase and possess semiautomatic rifles and shotguns from 18 to 21. The bill, hailed by gun control advocates as a life-saving measure, now sits on the desk of Republican Governor Joe Lombardo, who must decide whether to sign it into law or veto what critics call a severe restriction on constitutional rights.
Everytown Applauds Passage as a “Victory for Gun Safety”

According to a May 23rd press release from Everytown for Gun Safety, the bill’s passage represents a major step forward in reducing gun violence among youth in Nevada. Aurora Cox, a Nevada volunteer with Moms Demand Action, praised lawmakers, saying, “We’re putting a simple, life-saving safeguard in place.” She argued that increasing the age requirement will help prevent tragedies like Uvalde and Club Q, where 18- to 20-year-olds were able to legally acquire semiautomatic weapons.
Students Demand Action: “We’ve Been Begging Adults to Protect Us”

Malcolm Greer, a volunteer with Students Demand Action, voiced the concerns of Generation Z in the same Everytown release. “Being Gen Z means I’ve grown up in a world where the threat of a mass shooting is part of our everyday reality,” he said. Greer emphasized that while the bill won’t fix everything, it’s a critical first step toward saving lives and recognizing the trauma younger generations face from gun violence.
Gun Rights Advocate Warns: “Unconstitutional Ban on Law-Abiding Adults”

Meanwhile, the gun rights community is raising alarms. In a video posted by Copper Jacket TV, William, a pro-2A content creator based in Nevada, called AB245 a “completely unconstitutional” overreach. He pointed out that 18-, 19-, and 20-year-olds can serve in the military, vote, sign contracts, and be legally tried as adults – but would now be stripped of the right to possess certain firearms. “It treats the Second Amendment like a second-class right,” he argued.
New Storage Laws Create More Restrictions

AB245 doesn’t just raise the minimum age – it also imposes new storage requirements for gun owners. William explains that if you live with anyone under 21, even if they’re an adult, you must now keep all semiautomatic firearms locked up at all times unless they’re under your immediate control. Failure to comply could result in a gross misdemeanor, heavy fines, and even jail time. William warned that this could criminalize people simply for trusting roommates or adult children with home defense responsibilities.
No Grandfather Clause Raises Legal Questions

According to William’s detailed breakdown of the bill, there appears to be no grandfather clause. This means 18- to 20-year-olds who already legally own semiautomatic shotguns or rifles might be criminalized retroactively. “I’ve read the entire bill and I don’t see anything that allows you to keep a firearm you bought before the law passed,” he said. This lack of clarity could open the door to legal battles and confusion for young gun owners across Nevada.
Everytown Points to National Trends and Voter Support

Everytown argues that Nevada is simply joining a national trend. According to their press release, 22 states have already raised the legal age to purchase certain firearms, including Florida. Twelve of those states specifically bar those under 21 from buying semiautomatic rifles. Polling by Everytown also shows 77% of Nevadans support this measure, including 69% of Republicans and 68% of gun owners. They argue that this reflects a bipartisan desire for stronger safeguards, especially after the state has seen an average of 581 gun deaths and 481 injuries annually.
Public Safety vs. Individual Liberty

This bill is a classic collision between two competing values: public safety and individual liberty. Advocates like Everytown and Moms Demand Action believe the science is clear – young adults are more impulsive and more prone to violent behavior, and this age restriction can save lives. But critics, including William and other Second Amendment supporters, argue that the bill unfairly targets lawful citizens while doing little to stop actual criminals.
Governor Lombardo’s Decision Could Define His Career

Nevada Governor Joe Lombardo, a Republican, now faces a high-pressure decision. William notes in his video that Lombardo hasn’t been tested much on Second Amendment issues, and this bill may serve as his defining moment. “If he signs AB245, he will be a one-term governor,” William predicted, warning that gun rights voters in Nevada will respond at the ballot box. For Lombardo, the political stakes are enormous.
This Law Feels Like a Test Balloon

Here’s what fascinates me – AB245 isn’t just about Nevada. It feels like a test case for how far state legislatures can go in restricting firearms access before pushback becomes too great. If this law passes and survives legal scrutiny, expect similar bills to pop up in other swing states. It’s a classic example of where policy meets culture – and where that clash leaves us questioning what the “right balance” really is.
Where Is the Line Between Reform and Overreach?

While the intention behind AB245 is clearly to reduce harm, it also introduces broad restrictions that, depending on your perspective, may step too far into personal liberties. For example, safe storage laws make sense on paper, but if enforced too rigidly, they could prevent a legal adult from defending themselves in a crisis. That’s not a simple safety net – it’s a potential hazard of its own. The lack of a grandfather clause only raises more questions.
A Legal Fight Seems Likely

Regardless of Governor Lombardo’s decision, it’s likely AB245 will end up in court. Gun rights organizations are already gearing up to challenge the measure if it’s signed into law. Legal experts will debate whether the bill conflicts with the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment, or whether states truly have the right to raise the age based on public safety concerns. We’ve seen these fights in California, Florida, and Oregon. Nevada could be next.
A Defining Moment for Gun Policy in Nevada

In the end, AB245 could become a landmark case in Nevada’s legislative history. It represents a clear divide between two visions for the future of firearms policy – one driven by prevention and restriction, and another grounded in constitutional freedoms and personal responsibility. What Governor Lombardo does next won’t just affect his political career. It may also set a tone for gun rights battles across the country in 2025 and beyond.

A former park ranger and wildlife conservationist, Lisa’s passion for survival started with her deep connection to nature. Raised on a small farm in northern Wisconsin, she learned how to grow her own food, raise livestock, and live off the land. Lisa is our dedicated Second Amendment news writer and also focuses on homesteading, natural remedies, and survival strategies. Lisa aims to help others live more sustainably and prepare for the unexpected.

































