Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

News

Wildlife officers spend 2 years taking down massive Ohio poaching ring

Wildlife officers spend 2 years taking down massive Ohio poaching ring
Image Credit: WildlifeWarden

Ohio wildlife officers spent nearly two years unraveling what investigators described as a sprawling poaching operation tied to a shared hunting lease, eventually connecting multiple hunters to allegations involving night hunting, hunting from vehicles, false deer check-ins, tag swapping and animals that were never properly reported at all.

Bodycam footage compiled by the YouTube channel WildlifeWarden shows the investigation reaching a major turning point on Jan. 5, 2025, when officers spread across Guernsey County and simultaneously contacted several people connected to the case, some of whom were still actively hunting when wardens arrived.

The investigation had begun with a tip in October 2023 and ultimately reached into Guernsey, Muskingum and Licking counties. Eleven people faced charges connected to the broader investigation, with several later convicted and receiving penalties ranging from restitution and license suspensions to house arrest and jail time.

Officers Tell Hunters It Is A “Day Of Reckoning”

WildlifeWarden’s narrator said officers had spent more than a year quietly gathering information before the coordinated January operation, using interviews, electronic evidence, hunting records and other investigative work to piece together what had allegedly been happening across multiple seasons.

One of the first encounters involved Paul Laurain, who was approached while hunting by Ohio wildlife officer Kirk Keiffer.

Keiffer told Laurain almost immediately that officers were not there by accident.

“Today is going to be kind of a day of reckoning,” the officer said, explaining that investigators needed to discuss Laurain and “a lot of friends.”

Officers Tell Hunters It Is A “Day Of Reckoning”
Image Credit: WildlifeWarden

Laurain appeared nervous and initially insisted that he had not done anything illegal, but Keiffer repeatedly reminded him that officers had already done extensive homework and verified substantial portions of the information they had received.

The warden also revealed how broad the operation had become, telling Laurain that officers were simultaneously speaking with other people at different properties, including hunters associated with the same lease and even individuals outside Ohio.

That coordinated approach mattered because it made it much harder for members of the group to compare stories once the interviews began.

Tag Swapping Became A Major Focus

A recurring theme throughout Keiffer’s questioning was the alleged practice of one person killing a deer and another person using his or her permit to check it in.

The officer confronted Laurain about an annual doe hunt where, according to investigators, not every deer had been checked and some had been reported under permits belonging to people who did not actually shoot them.

Keiffer specifically asked how many deer Marcie Kerr had checked in for other hunters.

Laurain initially suggested only one, but the officer told him investigators already knew of more.

Tag Swapping Became A Major Focus
Image Credit: WildlifeWarden

The questioning then moved toward Todd Brown, whom officers described as one of the central figures in the investigation. Keiffer said investigators knew Brown had killed multiple bucks and alleged that some had been taken with spotlights after dark.

One particularly complicated deer became a major piece of the case.

According to the channel, a buck had first been wounded, then located with help from a hired drone. Officers alleged that the deer was later killed after dark, with the drone assisting in locating it, and then checked under a permit belonging to someone who had not fired the fatal shot.

Kerr ultimately pleaded guilty to tagging an 11-point buck taken by another person, according to WildlifeWarden. She received a suspended 30-day jail sentence and a two-year hunting-license suspension.

Investigators Say Hunters Were Watching The DNR Plane

Keiffer also confronted Laurain about something far more unusual: hunters allegedly tracking an Ohio Department of Natural Resources aircraft through a phone application.

The officer said investigators believed members of the group had sat inside a barn watching the plane’s location so they would know when wildlife officers were conducting aerial enforcement.

Laurain denied personally using the app, but Keiffer told him officers knew people had remained inside the barn while the aircraft was overhead and that a deer was illegally killed at another location shortly afterward.

“There’s only one reason you do that,” Keiffer said, arguing that someone monitoring the enforcement aircraft while hiding indoors would have been trying to avoid detection while jacklighting.

Whether every person around the lease participated in every violation was another matter, and Keiffer repeatedly told Laurain that investigators were trying to separate direct involvement from people who merely knew what others were doing.

That distinction is important in a case involving so many people because association with a hunting camp does not automatically establish participation in a crime. The bodycam footage shows officers repeatedly pressing individuals for specific details rather than simply treating the entire group as equally responsible.

Other Hunters Were Contacted At The Same Time

While Keiffer interviewed Laurain, wildlife officer Wes Felner tracked down David Hatcher and another hunter in the woods.

Other Hunters Were Contacted At The Same Time
Image Credit: WildlifeWarden

Hatcher initially appeared confused about why wardens had interrupted the hunt and asked whether he had done something wrong.

“We’ll get into that,” Felner replied.

Officers also contacted James Laurain, Paul’s father, and questioned him about deer reporting and hunting requirements.

WildlifeWarden later reported that Paul Laurain was convicted on two counts of aiding another offender and for failing to wear hunter orange. He was ordered to pay $550 in restitution and lost his hunting privileges for three years.

James Laurain was convicted of failing to game-check a deer and failing to wear hunter orange, receiving $250 in deer restitution and a three-year license revocation.

Hatcher was charged in connection with possessing an untagged deer and transporting an untagged deer to Illinois. Any charge not resulting in a conviction remains an allegation, and those defendants are presumed innocent unless proven guilty.

Todd Brown And James Barrett Faced Some Of The Heaviest Penalties

WildlifeWarden described Todd Brown as one of the most significant figures in the entire investigation.

Brown was convicted of multiple violations in Muskingum County, including hunting deer without the required nonresident license and permit, jacklighting and failing to game-check deer.

His sentence included more than $9,400 in restitution, forfeiture of two sets of antlers, a three-year hunting-license revocation, 300 suspended days in jail and five years of non-reporting probation.

Todd Brown And James Barrett Faced Some Of The Heaviest Penalties
Image Credit: WildlifeWarden

James Barrett also faced serious consequences across two separate cases.

In Licking County, he was convicted of jacklighting, hunting with the aid of a motor vehicle and failing to game-check a deer.

A separate Muskingum County case involved additional convictions for jacklighting and hunting from a vehicle, along with littering a deer carcass on state property and stealing a cellular trail camera.

WildlifeWarden said Barrett received a 90-day jail sentence with 12 days actually served, 300 days of house arrest, probation and GPS monitoring that cost him roughly $3,600, in addition to restitution and hunting-license revocations.

The penalties show why wildlife violations that may sound minor in isolation can become much more serious when repeated over multiple seasons and combined with other offenses.

Eleven People Were Swept Into The Investigation

The wider case extended well beyond Brown and Barrett.

Jonathan Ricker was convicted of hunting without a nonresident deer permit, failing to game-check a deer and providing false information during game checking. His hunting license was revoked for three years.

Russell Hammer faced accusations involving taking more than one antlered deer and failing to game-check it, with the channel reporting $1,500 in restitution and a one-year license revocation.

Jozi Shoults was accused of allowing her permit to be used for a deer killed by someone else, while Brian Hornyak was charged over false game-check information connected to a deer investigators said Hammer had killed.

Donnie Dowdy faced allegations involving spotlighting, hunting with a motor vehicle, leaving Ohio with an unchecked deer and using an unauthorized hunting implement.

Eleven People Were Swept Into The Investigation
Image Credit: WildlifeWarden

The bodycam footage also showed officers questioning Brian Hornyak about a buck he had reported killing. Investigators told him they did not believe he had actually killed the deer and said they already knew where the antlers had ended up.

The sheer number of names, counties and individual deer involved helps explain why the investigation lasted so long.

Two Years Of Work Ended With A Coordinated Crackdown

WildlifeWarden said investigators seized cell phones, antlers, taxidermy records and dozens of packages of deer meat as they built the case.

The January 2025 operation was therefore not the beginning of the investigation but the moment when a long-running intelligence effort became visible to the hunters themselves.

By then, officers appeared to know far more than many of the people being interviewed expected.

Keiffer repeatedly told Laurain that he did not know what investigators already had, a theme that ran through much of the footage as wardens tested stories against records and evidence gathered during the previous hunting seasons.

For wildlife officers, cases like this are not simply about whether one deer was improperly tagged.

The alleged conduct described by the channel involved repeated efforts to evade hunting limits and reporting requirements, including spotlighting animals, using vehicles, swapping permits and, in some cases, allegedly monitoring enforcement aircraft.

By the time the cases worked their way through the courts, several members of the group had lost hunting privileges, paid thousands of dollars and, in Barrett’s case, served jail time and months of house arrest.

What began with a single tip in 2023 had grown into one of the largest poaching investigations WildlifeWarden has covered, showing how a pattern of relatively small hunting violations can become a major multi-county case once investigators begin connecting the records, the people and the animals involved.

You May Also Like

News

Image Credit: Max Velocity - Severe Weather Center