A massage therapist in Quincy, Illinois, initially told a detective that an appointment had unfolded normally, but the investigation later led to his arrest, six criminal-abuse charges, and a three-year prison sentence after additional women came forward.
BodyCam K9 presented footage beginning on November 17, 2025, when a detective visited the therapist at work following an allegation from a client who said she had been touched inappropriately during a massage.
The therapist, identified in the footage as Joseph Ware, was not arrested during that first conversation. Detective Piston of the Quincy Police Department instead questioned him at length about the appointment, his draping practices, the areas he massaged, and whether anything could have happened that made the client uncomfortable.
Joseph repeatedly said he believed he had acted professionally, although several details emerged during the interview that drew further questions from the detective.
Detective Arrives at the Spa
Detective Piston approached Joseph at his workplace and asked to speak away from a co-worker who was inside.
The detective told him immediately that he was not under arrest, explaining that officers would have handled the encounter differently if they had intended to take him into custody at that point.
Piston asked whether Joseph had expected contact from law enforcement.
“Nothing, no,” Joseph replied.
The detective initially invited him to continue the interview at the police department, saying a more private setting would allow investigators to be thorough and could also help Joseph explain himself fully.
Joseph preferred to speak at the spa, so the detective began asking about a female client who had recently attended an appointment.

Joseph confirmed that he remembered her and said the session had gone the same way as his other massages.
According to his account, he covered each section of the client’s body with draping, uncovered only the area being worked on, and asked her to adjust the arrangement according to her comfort level.
“Everything was normal, I thought,” he said.
Therapist Describes the Massage
Joseph said the client had booked a deep-tissue, full-body massage.
He described beginning at the feet, moving up each leg, then having the client turn onto her back so he could work on her arms and neck.
The detective asked how far up the legs he normally worked.
Joseph demonstrated on himself, indicating that he would massage the upper thigh near the adductor muscles but said he would not intentionally move into the groin area.
He explained that massage therapists work along the length of a muscle from its insertion to its origin, making contact with the upper thigh part of the treatment.
Piston also asked whether Joseph worked on clients’ buttocks.
Joseph referred to that area as the glutes and said massage there could address muscles connected to the IT band and piriformis. He said he always asked clients whether they were comfortable before working in those areas.
The therapist’s explanation showed why the investigation depended heavily on fine details. Massage work can require contact near private areas, making consent, draping, communication, and exact hand placement especially important.
As the detective put it, the case could come down to “literally a hand movement.”
Joseph Allows That Contact May Have Happened
Piston eventually raised the specific allegation that Joseph’s hand may have touched the client’s intimate area.
Joseph did not say such contact was impossible.
“My fingers are large. Maybe it touched, but I didn’t feel any different,” he said, while maintaining that he had only been working on her thigh.
He added that clients were told to speak up during appointments if they became uncomfortable.
Joseph said that if the woman felt something unusual but did not mention it at the time, he would not necessarily have known what had bothered her.
That response placed considerable responsibility on the client to object during a vulnerable situation. While communication is important during any massage, a customer’s silence does not automatically establish consent to unexpected intimate contact, particularly when the person may be confused, frightened, or uncertain about whether the touch was accidental.
The detective did not openly accuse Joseph of lying, but he continued testing the therapist’s explanation.
He asked whether Joseph had ever become careless with draping after becoming more comfortable in the job. Joseph denied it and said he followed the same procedure for every client, especially because women might already feel vulnerable while receiving a massage from a man.
A Longer-Than-Expected Appointment Raises Questions
The detective also asked why the session apparently lasted around one hour and 40 minutes.
Joseph said he had not realized it had continued that long.

He explained that the massage room was kept dark, with only a salt lamp providing light, and said he sometimes lost track of time while concentrating on the client’s body.
Joseph also suggested that appointments could run over when clients arrived late or when he spent longer than expected finishing a particular area.
Piston asked whether he extended massages in hopes of receiving larger tips.
Joseph denied doing so.
The detective estimated the appointment’s length by comparing a message about opening the door with the time the client’s credit card payment was processed. Joseph maintained that the longer session resulted from poor timekeeping rather than any improper purpose.
The unusually long appointment did not by itself establish criminal conduct, but it became another detail investigators needed to compare with the client’s account.
In cases involving conduct behind a closed door, timelines and small inconsistencies can become important because there may be no camera or independent witness inside the room.
A Follow-Up Message Draws Attention
Joseph told the detective that he texted the woman after the massage.
He said the message thanked her for coming and expressed hope that she felt better.
When asked whether he normally sent such messages, Joseph said he did so with certain clients and added that the woman had seemed “a little off” while leaving.
That observation caught Piston’s attention.
Joseph said he noticed that she appeared unusual or uncomfortable, so he sent the brief follow-up. He also said he escorted her outside because the spa was being locked and it was getting dark.
The detective instructed him not to contact her again.
Piston acknowledged that Joseph might feel tempted to ask what had happened, challenge the allegation, or apologize, but warned him to avoid any direct communication while the investigation continued.
That was sensible guidance. Even a message intended as an apology could be viewed as pressure, interference, or an admission, while an angry response could deepen the client’s distress.
Therapist Continues to Deny Intentional Misconduct
Throughout the interview, Joseph said he had worked as a massage therapist for roughly three years, first from his home and later at the same spa.
He claimed no other client had accused him of similar behavior.
Piston told him investigators had also found no additional allegations at that stage, although he asked directly whether anyone else might come forward once the case became known.
“I hope not,” Joseph replied.
Joseph denied ever becoming sexually aroused during the woman’s appointment and said such conduct would be inconsistent with his job.
He also explained that he wore a lotion bottle in a holster near his waist, suggesting that it could potentially account for something the woman felt during the massage.
The detective asked about the client’s personal life and whether Joseph knew her outside the spa. Joseph said he had no personal relationship with her and remembered only brief conversation about hiking and muscle soreness.
He continued to insist that he had worked on her legs, glutes, arms, neck, and other areas as part of an ordinary deep-tissue session.
“I promise, man, I didn’t think I was doing anything wrong,” Joseph said near the end of the interview. “I was doing my job.”
Piston responded that this was why he was asking questions rather than making accusations during that encounter.
Officers Return With an Arrest Warrant
The initial interview ended without an arrest.
The footage later showed officers returning to Joseph’s workplace and telling him to turn around because a warrant had been issued.
“You’ve got a warrant for criminal abuse,” an officer said before placing him under arrest.

According to the BodyCam K9 narrator, two additional victims came forward after Joseph’s arrest, bringing the total number of women alleging abuse during massages to three.
He was ultimately charged with six counts of criminal abuse.
The channel reported that Joseph later accepted a plea agreement and was convicted of one count. He received a sentence of three years in the Illinois state prison system.
That outcome significantly changed the context of the first interview. Joseph’s statements at the spa were initially only one side of an unresolved allegation, but the later guilty plea resulted in a criminal conviction.
The dismissal or reduction of other counts through a plea agreement does not necessarily show that the remaining allegations were false; it means prosecutors and the defendant resolved the case without taking every charge to trial.
A Profession Built on Trust
Massage therapy requires clients to place unusual trust in another person.
They may be partially undressed, alone in a darkened room, and uncertain about which areas can properly be touched during treatment. The therapist therefore carries a greater responsibility to explain boundaries clearly and ensure that consent remains active throughout the appointment.
Joseph repeatedly said he invited clients to communicate and followed professional draping procedures. Yet the case did not end with that first woman’s allegation, and the later arrival of two more accusers gave investigators a broader pattern to consider.
The footage also shows why clients may not confront a therapist immediately. A person can leave an appointment unsure whether a touch was accidental, medically appropriate, or abusive, then understand the experience differently after reaching a safer place and discussing it with someone else.
Detective Piston appeared aware of that possibility when he suggested the woman may have processed the encounter after arriving home.
What began as a calm workplace interview eventually resulted in an arrest and prison sentence. For the clients involved, the case was about alleged violations during moments of vulnerability; for investigators, it depended on reconstructing movements that occurred privately and could be described very differently by the people inside the room.

Gary’s love for adventure and preparedness stems from his background as a former Army medic. Having served in remote locations around the world, he knows the importance of being ready for any situation, whether in the wilderness or urban environments. Gary’s practical medical expertise blends with his passion for outdoor survival, making him an expert in both emergency medical care and rugged, off-the-grid living. He writes to equip readers with the skills needed to stay safe and resilient in any scenario.


































