Donald Trump made waves this week with a bold proposal: take $3 billion in taxpayer money earmarked for Harvard and send it to America’s trade schools instead. That simple suggestion lit up Mike Rowe’s phone, inbox, and media invites. As the founder of the mikeroweWORKS Foundation and long-time trades advocate, Rowe found himself at the center of a national conversation he’s been pushing for more than a decade.
Mike Rowe Says “How About That?”
In the Hot Takes segment of his July podcast episode, Rowe told co-host Charles Klausmeyer that his first reaction was, “How about that?” He noted the idea echoed testimony he gave to Congress ten years ago. “It was like watching the headlines catch up with everything I’ve been saying for 16 years,” he said. For Rowe, the proposal was more than political – it was personal.
Rowe explained that he received over 150 texts and emails in one day. “People wanted to know if I had something to do with it,” he joked. Although he didn’t, Rowe admitted the timing was uncanny. Every major news outlet wanted a comment. Instead of hopping from interview to interview, he poured himself a glass of Knobel whiskey and let Klausmeyer “interview him properly” for his podcast audience.
Shop Class Nostalgia Turns Into Policy Talk
Rowe and Klausmeyer reflected on the decline of shop classes in American high schools. Rowe said the disappearance of hands-on vocational training sent the wrong message: “Taking shop class out of high school sent a clear signal to kids – that those jobs didn’t exist anymore.” He believes that loss helped create today’s “skills gap,” where millions of jobs in trades go unfilled.
Rowe credited actor John Ratzenberger, famous for Cheers and also a trade school advocate, as someone who warned about the disappearance of shop class. “He told me years ago it would all come down to whether we could get shop back into schools,” Rowe said. While he admits it may be hard to restore traditional programs, he thinks it’s possible to build “shop-type environments” near schools or open standalone trade campuses.
Trade Schools vs. Harvard’s Billions
When Klausmeyer asked the big question – should the $3 billion go to trade schools instead of Harvard? – Rowe didn’t hesitate. “In a binary world? Of course, I’d give it to the trade schools.” He said Harvard has “peed itself” repeatedly in recent years, from anti-Semitism controversies to plagiarism scandals. Rowe also pointed out Harvard’s $54 billion endowment, calling it “the wealthiest, most prestigious university in the world.”
No Constitutional Right to Be Tax-Exempt
Rowe took aim at Harvard’s current leadership for claiming a “constitutional right” to its tax-exempt status. “I’m pretty sure there’s no constitutional right to be tax-exempt,” he said. He finds it troubling that an institution with tens of billions in assets still receives taxpayer funding. Rowe believes it’s time to question why certain schools are untouchable when they aren’t producing results that justify the cost.
Not Just About Taking – But About Accountability
While Rowe supports redirecting funds to the trades, he warned against simply throwing money at the problem. “Giving any institution money with no strings attached is a bad idea,” he said. Rowe called for a “means-tested approach” that ensures taxpayer money only goes to vetted trade schools and serious students. He emphasized that some trade schools are excellent, but others abuse their status and fail students.
Throughout the episode, Rowe argued that Harvard and schools like it don’t reflect the country anymore. “Ninety-seven percent of the professors at Harvard admit they lean far to the left,” he said. That, combined with rising tuition and tax privileges, creates a “two-tiered system” where elite universities are protected and blue-collar pathways are ignored.
Mike’s Dream Plan for the $3 Billion
Rowe offered a clear vision for how he’d use the money: create the largest skilled trade scholarship fund in history. He’d fund training programs for the most in-demand jobs, carefully vet schools, and make sure students were serious. “I would means-test the taxpayer’s money and make damn sure that the people we give it to are serious about learning a skill that’s in demand.”
Promoting Success Stories, Not Just Policy
Another major piece of Rowe’s plan would involve public outreach. He said he’d use part of the money to buy media campaigns that highlight real trade workers’ success stories. “I’d plaster them on billboards, TikTok, and Instagram,” he said. By showing real people thriving in trades, he hopes to change the cultural narrative around vocational work.
Why Rowe’s Message Hits Home
Rowe’s argument resonates because it’s grounded in common sense. Instead of obsessing over elite credentials, he focuses on what actually helps people get jobs. In a country where 7.6 million positions are open, many of them skilled trades, his logic is hard to ignore. Rowe isn’t just talking policy. He’s talking about dignity, purpose, and how to fix a broken system.
When Common Sense Challenges Prestige
This whole debate isn’t really about Trump or Harvard. It’s about what we value as a country. Do we keep throwing money at the top while ignoring the bottom? Or do we invest in the workers who literally keep the lights on, the cars running, and the buildings standing? Rowe is tapping into something bigger than politics, he’s giving voice to the people who are often overlooked.
A Problem Too Big to Ignore
Rowe ended the episode with a dose of realism. He doesn’t think $3 billion will magically fix everything, but the fact that people are finally having the conversation is a win in itself. Whether or not the money ever moves, the spotlight is now on America’s need for skilled labor – and that’s a conversation worth having.
A Bigger Shift May Be Coming
Mike Rowe didn’t ask to be the face of this debate, but after years of advocacy, he’s earned the mic. His message is clear: we don’t just need more funding – we need better priorities. As the cost of college rises and the need for trades grows, maybe the real question isn’t whether we should fund Harvard or trade schools, it’s whether we’re ready to rethink the whole system.
UP NEXT: “Heavily Armed” — See Which States Are The Most Strapped
Image Credit: Survival World
Americans have long debated the role of firearms, but one thing is sure — some states are far more armed than others. See where your state ranks in this new report on firearm ownership across the U.S.
Growing up in the Pacific Northwest, John developed a love for the great outdoors early on. With years of experience as a wilderness guide, he’s navigated rugged terrains and unpredictable weather patterns. John is also an avid hunter and fisherman who believes in sustainable living. His focus on practical survival skills, from building shelters to purifying water, reflects his passion for preparedness. When he’s not out in the wild, you can find him sharing his knowledge through writing, hoping to inspire others to embrace self-reliance.