A sweeping federal change to commercial licensing has immigrant truckers scrambling.
In a press conference carried by Forbes Breaking News, Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy declared an emergency overhaul of non-domiciled CDL eligibility “effective immediately,” ordering states to pause issuance of those licenses until they can comply with tighter standards and warning of withheld federal funds for laggards – especially California, which he singled out as “out of compliance.”
On the ground, Alex Mai of Mutha Trucker – Official Trucking Channel reports the first real-world fallout: immigrant drivers being denied CDL renewals in California and elsewhere, including a DACA recipient who says he’s now barred despite flawless English and years behind the wheel.
Why Duffy Says the System Is Broken
Secretary Duffy framed the move as a response to “a national emergency,” pointing to fatal crashes he says involved non-domiciled CDL holders.
He cited three cases – Texas (a 17-vehicle pileup), Alabama (a red-light rear-end crash by a driver with mere weeks of experience), and Florida (an illegal U-turn that killed three) – as evidence that “dangerous, unqualified drivers” have slipped through.
According to Duffy, a nationwide audit found states issuing CDLs “months and even years” beyond lawful presence, sometimes without validating status at all. His bottom line: the rules were too loose, states weren’t following even those, and American families are paying the price.
The New Rule, in Duffy’s Words
Duffy says the final rule (not a proposal) tightens who is eligible for a non-domiciled CDL and forces an immediate pause while states retool systems.
“Non-citizens will not be eligible for a CDL unless they meet a much stricter set of rules,” he said, adding that states must ensure license terms match lawful presence and verify immigration status using federal systems.
He also announced targeted enforcement against California following an onsite FMCSA review that, by his account, found over 25% of reviewed non-domiciled CDLs were improperly issued.
California in the Crosshairs
Duffy’s most pointed criticism was aimed at California. He displayed anonymized records he says show: a Brazilian driver licensed for school bus operation beyond work authorization; two Mexican citizens granted US CDLs (ineligible under reciprocity rules) with expiration years past work authorization; and a Honduran driver issued a CDL with no evidence of lawful presence validation.
California, he said, has 30 days to “fix this” or face $160 million in withheld highway funds in year one, doubling the next year. He also flagged Colorado, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, and Washington for improper issuances, warning that more states could face actions as the audit expands.
What Drivers Are Seeing at the Window
On his channel, Alex Mai surfaced two very different but equally fraught stories.
In California, a driver told local media (speaking in Hindi) he was denied renewal under the new rule because he lacked a green card or US citizenship and struggled with English proficiency – an issue Mai says many drivers have raised as a core safety concern.
In Utah, Mai highlighted a DACA recipient – brought to the US at age two, fluent in English, and employed under a valid Employment Authorization Document (EAD) – who now says he cannot renew because an EAD alone no longer suffices. “If I have a work permit and I’m protected,” the driver asks on camera, “am I illegal?”
The New Eligibility Reality (As Reported)
Mai stresses the rule does not bar all immigrants from trucking; rather, it narrows the path. He notes (based on his reporting) that certain visa categories – H-2A, H-2B, and E-2 – “will generally qualify” non-citizens for CDLs, if states verify status through federal systems and tie license expiration to lawful presence.
The sharpest shift, in his view, is that EAD-only drivers – common among DACA recipients and other work-authorized immigrants – are now blocked unless they secure permanent residency or another qualifying status.
He also reiterates Duffy’s enforcement threat: states resisting implementation could face funding cuts and stepped-up audits.
English Proficiency: Safety Principle or Gatekeeping?
Mai doesn’t mince words about language: if a driver “can’t read the signs” or communicate with law enforcement, he says, they shouldn’t be in an 80,000-pound vehicle. That resonates with many US-born drivers who’ve long complained about communication barriers at weigh stations, docks, and crash scenes.
But here’s where the outrage flares: the DACA driver Mai featured does speak “amazing English,” holds a clean record (as represented in his story), and has done everything asked of him for years – yet is now bounced because his EAD is deemed insufficient under the new standard.
That feels less like a language or safety fix and more like a status wall.
A Policy Sledgehammer in a Precision Problem
My read: Duffy’s root critique – that some states mis-validated lawful presence, mismatched expirations, or issued US CDLs to Mexico/Canada citizens who should use home-country licenses – deserves a fix.
The English piece is also legitimate; communication is safety. But the new rule, as described in Duffy’s remarks and seen through Mai’s cases, does more than close loopholes – it redefines eligibility in a way that sweeps in EAD-only drivers who have worked legally for years.
That turns a compliance problem into a status purge, catching people who aren’t the ones gaming the system.
The Human Cost Duffy Doesn’t Dwell On
Duffy’s podium focused on worst-case crashes and state failures. Mai’s feed shows the people now in limbo: a father who can’t renew despite perfect English; another who’s lived here eight years, who likely should have been improving English yet now faces an instant stop sign.
Mai also cites a startling estimate he’s heard – “about 194,000 out of 200,000” non-domiciled CDL holders could lose renewals – a number that, if accurate, would be seismic for capacity (he frames it as what “they state,” and to be fair, he’s relaying chatter he’s seeing).
Whether the final impact is that large or not, the shock is already tangible at DMVs.
California’s Double Bind
California’s no stranger to federal showdowns. But trucking is interstate by design – a CDL issued in Sacramento rolls everywhere. If Duffy’s audit findings are right, California has to clean up validation, expiration alignment, and reciprocity mistakes.
The harder question is whether the state (or any state) has leeway under the new rule to treat EAD-authorized drivers – as opposed to only green card holders and citizens – as eligible. Duffy’s phrasing – “non-citizens will not be eligible… unless they meet a much stricter set of rules” – suggests most EAD-only renewals are a no.
That invites legal fights and leaves DMVs with triage lines and angry motorists today.
What Would a Fairer Fix Look Like?
If the goal is safety and rule integrity, there’s a middle lane. Keep the hard compliance: strict verification through federal systems; license expiration co-terminous with lawful presence; reciprocity honored (Mexico/Canada CDL holders use their home-country credentials); English proficiency enforced uniformly.
But give work-authorized drivers (like DACA and other EAD holders) a status-linked path: allow issuance/renewal that expires with EAD and requires continuous re-verification – no grace past the date, no mismatch. That preserves safety and compliance without detonating the livelihoods of people who have played by the rules as written for years.
Where This Leaves the Industry
Short term, carriers will lose some drivers overnight as renewals are denied; shippers will feel capacity ripples; states will scramble to align systems and audit backlogs. Long term, if this rule stands as Duffy described, the labor pool will tilt more heavily toward citizens and lawful permanent residents or specific visa holders, shutting out swaths of experienced, EAD-authorized drivers.
That may be the policy intent. But as Mai’s reporting shows, it lands hardest on neighbors we’ve trusted with freight for years – including those who did everything we asked, right up until the standard changed.
It’s About Status
Sean Duffy argues this is about saving lives and repairing a broken system. Alex Mai shows the first truckers who just lost their careers because that system was repaired with a sledgehammer. Both realities can be true: some states failed, and some drivers don’t belong behind the wheel; but many others – lawfully working, English-proficient professionals – are collateral damage.
If the administration wants credibility on safety, it should pair these crackdowns with a clear, verifiable renewal track for EAD-authorized, fully qualified drivers. Otherwise, the message immigrant truckers will hear is simple: It was never about safety. It was about status.
UP NEXT: “Heavily Armed” — See Which States Are The Most Strapped
Americans have long debated the role of firearms, but one thing is sure — some states are far more armed than others. See where your state ranks in this new report on firearm ownership across the U.S.
Ed spent his childhood in the backwoods of Maine, where harsh winters taught him the value of survival skills. With a background in bushcraft and off-grid living, Ed has honed his expertise in fire-making, hunting, and wild foraging. He writes from personal experience, sharing practical tips and hands-on techniques to thrive in any outdoor environment. Whether it’s primitive camping or full-scale survival, Ed’s advice is grounded in real-life challenges.