In his appearance on Piers Morgan Uncensored, former CIA covert officer Andrew Bustamante told Piers Morgan that the public timeline in the Charlie Kirk assassination simply doesn’t add up.
He points first to the news blackout. He says there’s been “no significant new information since about September 19,” which he calls “weird.”
Piers Morgan agrees the gaps are glaring. He notes there hasn’t even been an autopsy report released publicly.
Bustamante’s point is simple: when basic facts remain sealed, people fill the void. That’s where conspiracy theories breed – inside the unanswered questions.
And to be fair, he adds, there can be legitimate reasons to hold back details during an active investigation.
But he also says our media ecosystem has changed. We now “know more of what we don’t know,” which makes the silence feel louder.
Could a 22-Year-Old Pull Off a One-Shot Rooftop Hit?
Piers Morgan asks the blunt question: does the official story make sense on its own terms?
The shooter – 22-year-old Tyler James Robinson – allegedly climbed onto a rooftop at Utah Valley University, assembled a bolt-action rifle said to be his grandfather’s, fired a single fatal shot from roughly 142 yards, disassembled or stashed his weapon, and initially got away.
Bustamante doesn’t say it’s impossible.
He evaluates it the way intelligence officers do – by probability, not emotion.
He concedes the suspect had real advantages: area familiarity, surprise, and a hunting background that could explain comfort with a bolt-action rifle.
But he still isn’t buying the lone-actor scenario as the most likely outcome without significant pre-planning.
He says the timeline, the assembly/disassembly speed, the pre-arranged ingress and egress routes, and the successful execution of a single shot on a national figure all imply serious preparation.
And on that, Rob O’Neill – the former Navy SEAL Morgan hosted earlier – was skeptical too.
O’Neill didn’t believe he could assemble and strip down that rifle as fast as the official window suggests, which reinforces Bustamante’s doubt.
It’s not that one person couldn’t do it.
It’s that the probability of one 22-year-old doing all of it alone—and cleanly—isn’t high without extensive rehearsals or outside help.
Training, Aim, and Amateur Tells
Morgan points out a small but telling detail.
Yes, the shot was fatal. But based on how the bullet landed, he suggests the impact didn’t look like precise, professional target selection.
A pro would likely predict drift and body movement better, he says.
Bustamante agrees there are “amateur” tells in the execution.
That actually cuts both ways. On one hand, the imperfections support the idea of an inexperienced shooter, which fits the lone-wolf narrative.
On the other hand, the operational polish – the planning, the escape plan, the swift weapon handling – looks advanced for an untrained 22-year-old.
You can be amateur in marksmanship and still have help in logistics. The mix of rough and refined is exactly what makes this case feel off.
Parallels to the Attempt on Trump – and a Pattern of Missing Motive
Bustamante says his CIA instincts pushed him to compare the Kirk case to the attempt on Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania.
Same rough age range. High intelligence. Good social camouflage. A surprising capability under stress.
And again – no motive clarity.
Bustamante says it’s “very, very odd” how little we know about the Trump shooter’s background. He points to a strikingly thin digital footprint for a modern young adult.
He frames the commonality like this: the places where the public would expect transparency are exactly where the floor drops out.
That doesn’t prove a cover-up.
But it does suggest hidden information, and he says that is almost certainly true.
Morgan pushes him further: will we ever get answers? Bustamante’s answer is sober.
In his experience, if disclosure damages the perceived integrity of government operations or the architecture of national security, the system will “tailor and cultivate” what gets released—and what doesn’t.
That’s not a theory. It’s how he says the process actually works.
The CIA Then and Now – And What That Means for Trust
Morgan raises the old refrain: there’s no such thing as “former CIA.”
Bustamante doesn’t dodge. He acknowledges that service binds you for life in spirit. But he insists he’s not controlled by CIA now – and he says the Agency has repeatedly tried to push him off camera.
He brings receipts from his own experience.
His book Shadow Cell, he says, was fully written in 2021 and sent to CIA pre-publication review. After world events shifted in 2022, CIA tried to classify the entire manuscript, he says – premise, operation, characters, even aggregate numbers.
He and his wife fought for three years to get it cleared. In the end, he says they only won by threatening a First Amendment lawsuit backed by his public platform.
Why does that matter here?
Because it shows how hard the system leans on secrecy, even when authors argue they haven’t quoted classified documents.
Bustamante also criticizes the pre-9/11 CIA era as the Agency itself taught him: more “wild west,” less oversight, more reckless.
He won’t say the CIA did X or Y in any historic case. But he refuses to rule out what an un-overseen intelligence service might have done decades ago.
That historical caution colors how people read today’s silence. If Americans sense the facts are curated, they assume the story is curated too.
The Kirk Case: What We Know – and What We Don’t
The big picture remains stark.
Charlie Kirk was assassinated on September 10, 2025, at UVU during a Turning Point USA tour stop. Video of the attack ricocheted across social media.
The suspect, Tyler James Robinson, surrendered the next day. Prosecutors later charged him with murder and said they’d seek the death penalty, alleging a political motive.
The White House and national leaders condemned the killing. The political and cultural fallout was immediate and bitter. Those are the public facts.
But Andrew Bustamante says the key investigative facts – the kind that settle rumors – are the ones that remain foggy.
Where is the comprehensive timeline?
Where is the full forensics narrative?
What’s the definitive motive grounding?
And why the slow drip of basic confirmations?
You don’t have to believe in dark plots to believe in transparency.
In a high-trust society, autopsies, forensics, comms logs, and ballistics summaries are released methodically and promptly – unless releasing them would blow an active operation.
If this is that kind of case, officials should say so plainly and often.
My Read: Don’t Feed the Vacuum
Piers Morgan is right to ask the hard questions. Andrew Bustamante is right to evaluate by probability, not passion.
And the public is right to be uneasy when months pass without core answers. None of that means the official story is false. But silence is its own story.
If authorities want to tamp down the wildfire, they should move three things into daylight as soon as legally sound: a full autopsy summary, a ballistics and distance report, and a tight operational timeline of assembly, the shot, and flight.
Then explain what can’t be shared yet – and why. Tell people what you can prove, where you’re still testing, and what you’ll release next.
That’s how you drain oxygen from speculation without smothering the investigation.
On Piers Morgan Uncensored, Andrew Bustamante didn’t declare a grand conspiracy. He raised probability questions.
He contrasted amateur tells with professional-looking logistics. He tied the Kirk assassination to patterns seen in the Trump attempt – and to a long tradition of information gaps where the stakes are highest.
You don’t have to share his background to share his conclusion.
There are red flags in the timeline. There are holes where simple answers should be.
And until those are filled with facts, the public will keep filling them with theories.
For additional info, watch Andrew Bustamante’s clip of his appearance on Piers Morgan Uncensored here.
UP NEXT: “Heavily Armed” — See Which States Are The Most Strapped
Image Credit: Survival World
Americans have long debated the role of firearms, but one thing is sure — some states are far more armed than others. See where your state ranks in this new report on firearm ownership across the U.S.
The article Ex-CIA Raises Red Flags About Official Story in Kirk Case first appeared on Survival World.
Ed spent his childhood in the backwoods of Maine, where harsh winters taught him the value of survival skills. With a background in bushcraft and off-grid living, Ed has honed his expertise in fire-making, hunting, and wild foraging. He writes from personal experience, sharing practical tips and hands-on techniques to thrive in any outdoor environment. Whether it’s primitive camping or full-scale survival, Ed’s advice is grounded in real-life challenges.
