A food delivery that began with something as ordinary as banana pudding turned into a deadly robbery attempt in Miami Gardens, where a driver was allegedly confronted by two men, had a gun put to his head inside his own car and then opened fire with his own weapon.
Gun rights commentator Colion Noir focused on the case in a recent video, arguing that the incident showed how quickly delivery work can become dangerous and why drivers should think seriously about self-defense and preserving evidence when they spend their days entering unfamiliar neighborhoods and approaching strangers.
Noir’s video also included a WSVN 7News report by reporter Alex Browning, which described the shooting as a failed robbery attempt and showed the aftermath as investigators worked around a Toyota and a firearm lying nearby.
A Banana Pudding Delivery Turns Into Gunfire
Browning reported that the shooting happened Thursday afternoon along a residential block in Miami Gardens, where neighbors heard a rapid burst of gunfire shortly before 2 p.m.
One resident described hearing what sounded like a “shower of bullets,” while another account put the number of shots at around seven or more in quick succession.
Cellphone footage later showed the delivery driver pacing nearby after the shooting. Neighbors told WSVN that he identified himself as a food delivery worker and said someone had tried to rob him with a gun.

One woman told Browning that the driver approached people in the neighborhood while visibly nervous and asked whether anyone had captured video of what happened.
For Noir, that detail mattered almost as much as the shooting itself.
He said the driver appeared to understand immediately that surviving the robbery was only the first part of what he would have to deal with, because investigators would later need to decide whether his use of force was justified.
That is a reasonable point. In a chaotic encounter lasting only seconds, the people involved may know exactly why they acted, but police and prosecutors are left reconstructing everything afterward through physical evidence, witness accounts and video.
Police Reportedly Say A Gun Was Put To His Head
Noir then turned to details he said came from the police report.
According to the reporting discussed in his video, the delivery driver arrived with an order of banana pudding when 20-year-old Demetrius Travis and 19-year-old Jabari Thomas allegedly attempted to rob him.
Investigators said Thomas got into the rear seat of the driver’s car and, at one point, allegedly placed a gun against the driver’s head.
The two men were also accused of trying to access the driver’s Cash App.
Noir emphasized that this was not simply a dispute over a few dollars in somebody’s pocket. From his perspective, the driver was trapped in a confined space while armed strangers allegedly tried to gain access to his money and accounts, leaving him with no reliable way to know what they might do once they got what they wanted.
The driver then reached for his own gun and opened fire, according to the account presented in the video.
Noir said Travis was struck in the leg, chest and face and later died.
He also said Thomas was facing a murder charge tied to the alleged robbery, while the delivery driver remained at the scene.
Noir Says Delivery Drivers Are Easy Targets
After laying out the reported facts, Noir broadened the discussion to the risks faced by people who work through delivery and rideshare apps.

He pointed to another recent case involving a delivery driver in Virginia and argued that drivers have become tempting targets because criminals know roughly when and where they will arrive.
In Noir’s view, the structure of the job itself creates vulnerability. Drivers routinely travel to unfamiliar addresses, often alone, carrying phones, cash, food and sometimes other valuables while strangers know exactly when they are approaching.
He criticized the idea that a company policy can offer meaningful protection during that kind of encounter.
Noir said he did not care what Uber, DoorDash or other companies might say in their terms of service because those companies are not physically present when a driver pulls into an unfamiliar street and meets someone who may be waiting for them.
His language was deliberately blunt, but the underlying issue is worth noting. App-based work gives people flexibility, yet it also places much of the immediate safety burden on the individual worker, who may have little information about the person on the other side of the transaction.
“Carry A Camera Too”
Noir did not limit his advice to firearms.
He urged delivery and rideshare drivers to use cameras that capture more than just the road ahead, recommending systems that record the front, rear and interior of the vehicle and continue recording even after the engine is turned off.
He said he has installed such systems in his own vehicles and acknowledged that they can be expensive, but argued that the cost is worthwhile if the footage becomes important after a violent encounter.
“It will speak for you on the worst day of your life,” Noir said, describing the value of video when someone is too shaken to clearly explain everything that happened.
That part of his argument is probably the least politically charged and among the most practical. Video can support either side of a disputed account, and in a situation where everyone involved is frightened, injured or dead, a clear recording may become one of the strongest pieces of evidence available.
Noir also drew attention to the fact that police said two men were involved.
He argued that robbers often work in pairs because one person can distract or confront a victim while another moves behind them or blocks an escape route. In this case, he said, that dynamic allegedly ended with one man in the back seat and a gun at the driver’s head.
Noir Rejects The “Just Money” Argument
Noir then pushed back against people who might say the driver should not have used deadly force over property.
He argued that once someone points a gun at another person’s head, the victim is no longer simply deciding whether to surrender money. Instead, that person is being forced to trust an armed stranger to decide whether compliance is enough to keep them alive.

Noir said he would not hand over that decision to someone already willing to use a firearm during a robbery.
He also used the case to criticize restrictions on magazine capacity, arguing that lawmakers should not decide in advance how many rounds a person trapped in a vehicle might need during an armed attack.
In Noir’s telling, the driver could not easily create distance, leave the car or control the number of attackers. That, he said, is exactly the kind of circumstance in which an arbitrary ammunition limit makes little sense.
He tied that argument to the Second Amendment, saying its purpose is to empower the person who did not choose the confrontation.
The Legal Fight After The Shooting
WSVN’s Browning reported that investigators initially treated the matter as a claimed self-defense shooting and continued working the scene for hours.
The driver’s vehicle was tagged and towed while police processed evidence, and the driver himself was detained as officers investigated what had happened.
Noir stressed that this does not automatically mean police believed the driver had committed a crime. Instead, he said, investigators have to reconstruct the shooting because neither the detective nor the prosecutor was present when it happened.
He described that uncertainty as the second battle faced by someone who survives a violent encounter.
A person may believe the shooting was clearly justified, Noir said, but still has to wait while authorities determine whether the evidence supports that conclusion.
That is why he kept returning to the value of cameras and documentation.
The banana pudding order itself may sound almost absurd compared with what followed, but that contrast is part of what makes the case so unsettling. A routine delivery worth only a small amount of money allegedly became a confrontation involving a gun to a driver’s head, multiple shots, one dead suspect and another facing serious charges.
For Noir, the lesson was straightforward: people working alone out of their cars should not assume that an ordinary job guarantees an ordinary day, and they should think ahead about both surviving an attack and proving what happened afterward.

Growing up in the Pacific Northwest, John developed a love for the great outdoors early on. With years of experience as a wilderness guide, he’s navigated rugged terrains and unpredictable weather patterns. John is also an avid hunter and fisherman who believes in sustainable living. His focus on practical survival skills, from building shelters to purifying water, reflects his passion for preparedness. When he’s not out in the wild, you can find him sharing his knowledge through writing, hoping to inspire others to embrace self-reliance.


































