Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

News

A simple boating stop turned into a wildlife case after officers allegedly found nine undersized crawfish during an inspection.

A simple boating stop turned into a wildlife case after officers allegedly found nine undersized crawfish during an inspection.
Image Credit: Arrest Cam Fish and Wildlife

A Thanksgiving boating trip in the Florida Keys turned into a wildlife case after a Monroe County sheriff’s deputy inspected a family’s catch and allegedly found nine undersized spiny lobsters, commonly called crawfish in the region.

Body-camera footage presented by the YouTube channel Arrest Cam Fish and Wildlife showed Deputy Barr approaching the boat for what began as a routine safety and resource inspection. The people aboard were cooperative and told him they had caught many small lobsters but had thrown most of them back.

The conversation remained friendly as Barr checked life jackets, registration paperwork, flares, fire extinguishers, and other required equipment.

That tone changed once he began measuring the lobsters in their bucket.

Barr determined that only two were legal and that nine fell below the required minimum size. One woman, identified by the channel as Erin, eventually accepted responsibility for the catch rather than have several family members receive separate notices to appear.

The Stop Began With a Safety Check

Deputy Barr first asked how the group’s day had gone, and they described having only minor luck because many of the lobsters they encountered were small.

They said the outing had still been fun and that they had been sorting through the catch.

Barr identified himself and explained that he wanted to conduct a quick safety and resource inspection.

There appeared to be eight people aboard the 28-foot vessel, so he asked to see eight life jackets as well as a throwable flotation device.

The Stop Began With a Safety Check
Image Credit: Arrest Cam Fish and Wildlife

The boaters produced the life jackets, registration documents, a horn, flares, and one fire extinguisher. Barr explained that a vessel of that size required two extinguishers and also needed a Type IV throwable cushion or ring.

He handled those missing safety items as warnings rather than charges.

The deputy’s approach showed that the inspection was not initially focused on making arrests. He gave the family time to search the boat, answered questions, and explained the equipment rules as he went.

Nine Lobsters Allegedly Failed the Measurement

When Barr turned to the catch, the family said they had been releasing undersized lobsters throughout the day.

The deputy confirmed that he had watched them throw some back before boarding the vessel, which initially gave him reason to believe the remaining catch might be legal.

As the lobsters were removed from the container, however, Barr began identifying one after another as too small.

The family appeared shocked when he counted nine undersized animals and only two that met the standard.

Nine Lobsters Allegedly Failed the Measurement
Image Credit: Arrest Cam Fish and Wildlife

One person said they had been using their eyes to judge the size, while others said they had used a gauge but may not have placed it correctly.

Barr then demonstrated the proper method.

He explained that the measurement begins at the front of the carapace, between and just behind the eyes, and extends to the rear edge of the shell. The gauge must remain on the carapace without slipping off the back.

“If it falls off the back, it’s short,” he told them.

Some of the lobsters were close, but Barr emphasized that the rule did not provide room for estimates. A lobster was either legal or undersized.

That may feel unforgiving when the difference is small, but precise measurements are necessary for wildlife rules to mean anything. Allowing every person to decide what was “close enough” would make enforcement nearly impossible.

The Family Said the Mistake Was Accidental

Barr asked who had been diving, who had caught the lobsters, and who had taken part in measuring them.

Several people said they had been in the water, including adults and a daughter, while another person had been operating the boat.

The family maintained that they had not intentionally kept illegal lobsters. They pointed out that they had released many others and believed the remaining animals were large enough.

Barr said he understood that explanation and believed they appeared to be a nice family, but he could not ignore nine violations.

“I’m not taking anyone to jail,” he said, while making clear that possession of undersized lobster was an arrestable misdemeanor.

Because each lobster represented a separate alleged violation, Barr said he could issue notices to everyone involved or allow one adult to accept responsibility for the bucket.

The family discussed who should take the charges, at one point suggesting that a minor might be the best person because of work and travel concerns for the adults.

Barr stopped that discussion and said he would not place the responsibility on a child.

Erin ultimately agreed to accept the citations.

The deputy then read the group their rights before asking additional questions, explaining that the body-camera recording and legal nature of the investigation required him to do so.

Deputy Explained Why Lobster Rules Are Strict

Barr repeatedly told the family that protecting marine resources in the Keys was a major part of his job.

He said undersized lobster cases were taken seriously because harvesting animals before they reach the legal size can damage the population and undermine future seasons.

The deputy also explained that lobsters should be measured while the diver is still in the water.

Deputy Explained Why Lobster Rules Are Strict
Image Credit: Arrest Cam Fish and Wildlife

Each person catching lobster must have access to a measuring device, and the animal should be checked before it is placed aboard a boat or into a cooler.

Once the bag reaches the vessel, Barr said, the lobster is legally considered in the person’s possession.

Some members of the group admitted they had not carried a gauge during every dive.

Barr told them that failing to possess a measuring device in the water could itself be another misdemeanor, but he did not add that charge because he had not personally seen them diving without one.

He also warned them about using pole spears in restricted waters, explaining that the equipment had to remain out of use until they were beyond the regulated boundary.

Those explanations turned the stop into a long lesson on rules that the family appeared not to fully understand before entering the water.

Ignorance does not erase a violation, but clear instruction may prevent the same mistake from happening again.

Erin Received Nine Written Charges

Barr issued Erin a written notice to appear rather than physically arresting her.

He explained that signing the paperwork was not an admission of guilt. It only confirmed that she understood she had a court date.

The document listed nine separate misdemeanor counts, one for each undersized lobster.

Erin appeared concerned that the charges might affect her driver’s license or cause problems if she were later stopped while driving her children.

Barr assured her that the wildlife case was unrelated to the Department of Motor Vehicles and would not affect her license.

He said the main risk would arise if she failed to appear in court.

Erin Received Nine Written Charges
Image Credit: Arrest Cam Fish and Wildlife

The deputy measured the lobsters again on camera so the findings were clearly documented, allowing the family to watch each one fail the gauge.

He also permitted them to take photographs.

After recording the evidence, Barr counted all nine lobsters and returned them to the water. Some were alive and some were already dead, according to his body-camera narration.

Case Ended With Probation and Community Service

Arrest Cam Fish and Wildlife reported that Erin hired an attorney and initially pleaded not guilty.

Before the case reached trial, she changed her plea to no contest on all nine counts.

Her adjudication was withheld, meaning the court did not formally enter a conviction after accepting the plea and imposing penalties.

She was placed on probation for six months and ordered to complete 48 hours of community service.

The court allowed her to buy out those hours at a rate of $10 each through a donation to a Florida wildlife fund.

She was also ordered to pay $848 in court costs and fees.

The penalties were significant for what the family described as an honest measuring mistake, but the footage also showed why checking every lobster correctly matters before bringing it onto a boat.

Nine undersized animals were not a single technical error. Under the law explained by Barr, they represented nine individual violations.

The family’s cooperation and lack of a prior wildlife record appeared to keep the encounter from becoming more severe. Barr issued warnings for the missing safety equipment, declined to pursue possible measuring-device violations he had not personally observed, and allowed one adult to take responsibility rather than citing everyone involved.

Even so, the outing ended with nine misdemeanor charges, months of probation, community service, and hundreds of dollars in costs.

What began as a relaxed family trip became a reminder that wildlife regulations can carry criminal consequences, even when the people involved say they were trying to follow the rules.

For anyone harvesting lobster in the Keys, the lesson was straightforward: carry the correct gauge, measure every animal in the water, and never rely on eyesight when a fraction of an inch can determine whether the catch is legal.

You May Also Like

News

Image Credit: Max Velocity - Severe Weather Center