A 19-year-old Dollar General employee was arrested after investigators said she manipulated the store’s self-checkout system to dramatically reduce the prices of merchandise, turning purchases worth roughly $1,500 into transactions that cost her only a fraction of their actual value.
Bodycam footage published by Cam Stories TV shows officers responding to the Dollar General on April 19, 2023, after store loss-prevention personnel reported that the employee had been exploiting her access to price-changing codes and other parts of the checkout system. The channel’s narration described a broader scheme involving fake returns and manipulated transactions that investigators believed had continued for months, although much of the bodycam discussion centered specifically on unauthorized price overrides.
The employee, identified in the footage as Kaija, had already left the store by the time officers arrived, leaving police to work through surveillance video, transaction records and statements from employees before later going to her home.
Loss Prevention Says $1,500 Worth Of Goods Was Manipulated
The Dollar General loss-prevention representative told officers that Kaija had been using the self-checkout lane like an ordinary customer, but because she knew internal codes, she could allegedly override prices and reduce some items to as little as one penny.
He said store video showed her purchasing merchandise while changing the prices, and he estimated the difference between what the products should have cost and what she actually paid at about $1,500.

According to him, Kaija paid only about $67 for the merchandise covered by the larger group of suspicious transactions.
The responding officer did not simply accept that explanation at face value and repeatedly asked the loss-prevention worker how the store could prove that the unusually low prices resulted from intentional manipulation rather than a technical malfunction.
That was a sensible line of questioning because showing that items rang up cheaply is not the same as proving an employee deliberately changed the price, particularly when the alleged method involved internal software rather than something obvious like switching physical price stickers.
Officers Review The Transactions More Closely
Loss prevention began walking officers through individual purchases and the store’s surveillance footage, pointing to transaction records that showed the products being scanned and then sold at sharply reduced prices.
In one example, he said Kaija purchased merchandise that should have totaled about $78 but paid only $14.20 after overriding the prices.
The officer initially struggled to see exactly how the changes were being made on video, asking whether a single code altered an entire transaction or whether Kaija had to manually change each item.
As they watched more closely, the officer said it appeared she was entering information separately for individual products, while the loss-prevention representative agreed that some transactions appeared to involve manual overrides.
The store representative explained that employees normally would not all have authority to alter prices, but once someone obtained a manager’s code, they could potentially use it to make changes themselves.
He also said a code had previously been posted on the wall and claimed Kaija later told him that was the number she had used.
Loss Prevention Says She Admitted Using The Code
The loss-prevention representative told police that he had confronted Kaija before officers arrived and that she verbally acknowledged what she had done.
No other employee was present to directly corroborate that alleged admission, something officers specifically asked about.

The representative said he had initially tried to speak sympathetically with her because he knew she had a baby and believed she had been struggling financially after moving to the area.
He said many of the items she purchased appeared to be baby products and household goods, and when he raised her financial situation, she nodded in agreement.
According to his account, Kaija said she had used a number that had once been posted on the wall to process the transactions through self-checkout.
When he asked her to demonstrate exactly how she did it, however, she stopped cooperating, said she did not want to speak with anyone and asked to leave.
The loss-prevention employee told officers he could not legally keep her there, so she walked out before police arrived.
Other Employees Were Also Under Review
The store representative told investigators that Kaija was not the only worker suspected of improper price changes.
He said two other employees had been identified in similar activity, although their alleged amounts were far smaller, with one involving roughly a $78 difference and another involving only a small amount.

That detail suggested the store may have had a broader weakness in how override codes were controlled, even though loss prevention viewed Kaija’s alleged activity as much more extensive.
A store manager later confirmed Kaija’s identity from the surveillance video for police.
The manager explained that loss prevention had been reviewing footage and asked who the woman on camera was, at which point the manager provided her name.
That identification became another part of the investigative record before officers went to Kaija’s residence.
Police Find Her At Home
When officers arrived at the home, they told Kaija they were investigating what had happened at Dollar General and asked whether she wanted to give her side of the story.
An officer made clear that she did not have to speak with them and that, because it was a criminal investigation, they would need to advise her of her rights if she chose to make a statement.

Kaija hesitated and asked whether she could simply get a business card, but officers soon told her to turn around and place her hands behind her back.
She was then handcuffed and placed under arrest.
The interaction remained relatively calm, with officers allowing her to put on her shoes, remove jewelry that would otherwise be taken at the jail and say goodbye to her boyfriend, Freddy.
One officer explained the booking process to Freddy and told him she would likely be able to call him once she arrived at the jail.
She Later Considered Giving A Statement
During the ride, Kaija asked whether she would be able to give police her version of events once they reached the station.
The officer told her that they could take her into an interview room where the conversation would be recorded, but first he would have to read her Miranda rights.
He repeatedly emphasized that speaking was her choice.
Kaija indicated that she understood what the investigation concerned and appeared willing to consider giving a statement after they arrived.
The footage ends before showing any detailed interview or confession from her, so the loss-prevention employee’s account of her earlier admission remains the main explanation in the video for how the alleged scheme was carried out.
Case Began With A Grand Theft Charge

According to Cam Stories TV, Kaija was initially charged with grand theft after the investigation.
While the video title describes the case as a credit-card refund scam, the bodycam footage itself focuses largely on alleged price overrides at self-checkout, with the channel’s narration additionally saying investigators found fake returns and manipulated transactions as they looked further into the matter.
The most striking part of the case is how much access a relatively simple employee code allegedly provided. If investigators’ account was correct, merchandise worth hundreds or thousands of dollars did not need to be physically hidden or carried past a register without payment; instead, the prices could allegedly be changed inside the checkout system until expensive purchases appeared legitimate on the receipt.
What first looked like a string of unusually cheap transactions ultimately brought loss prevention, store management and police into the same investigation, ending with the 19-year-old employee being taken from her home in handcuffs on a grand theft allegation.

Raised in a small Arizona town, Kevin grew up surrounded by rugged desert landscapes and a family of hunters. His background in competitive shooting and firearms training has made him an authority on self-defense and gun safety. A certified firearms instructor, Kevin teaches others how to properly handle and maintain their weapons, whether for hunting, home defense, or survival situations. His writing focuses on responsible gun ownership, marksmanship, and the role of firearms in personal preparedness.


































