When Does Free Speech Cross the Line? Students Weigh In on Cancel Culture

At Penn State University, sociologist Dr. Sam Richards posed a question that hit close to home for his class: Are American students being silenced?

The discussion, featured on the YouTube channel SOC 119, centered on cancel culture, free expression, and the fine line between accountability and censorship.

Two students, Jenna and Cody, shared how social media has reshaped the meaning of free speech – and the consequences that follow.

Cody opened with a sharp observation: “Yes, you’re protected under free speech. But you still have consequences for your actions.”

His point came after referencing people who mocked the death of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk and lost their jobs for it. “Their first response is usually, ‘I didn’t know’ or ‘I thought I was protected,’” he said. “But that doesn’t mean you can say anything without fallout.”

“Stop Saying Stupid Stuff” – But Who Decides What’s Stupid?

Dr. Richards then asked whether “canceling people for saying stupid things” is necessarily wrong.

Jenna admitted she thinks sometimes it’s justified. “If you’re saying something really stupid, maybe it’s not a bad thing to face consequences,” she said.

But Richards challenged that line of thinking. “What constitutes ‘stupid stuff’?” he asked. “Because that’s going to be different for everyone.”

He gave the example of international students using the phrase “colored people” instead of “people of color” – and then being shouted down as racist without understanding why. “Some of these students speak English as a third or fourth language,” Richards explained. “They genuinely don’t know. And yet they get canceled for it.”

Cody agreed that the line is blurry. “You can’t manage it on a mass level,” he said. “It’s case by case. Everyone has different values and different things that make them upset.”

Cancel Culture’s Rise and Fade

When Dr. Richards asked how often students worry about being “canceled,” Jenna said she’s careful about what she posts – but not because she fears backlash every day.

She explained that cancel culture, in her view, “peaked during COVID” and has faded somewhat since. “I haven’t seen it as much lately,” she said. “But people still get canceled for dumb reasons – just because they made someone mad.”

That struck a chord with the class. Richards pointed out that outrage spreads faster online than in real life. “You don’t see people screaming at each other across campus,” he noted. “It’s mostly digital.”

Cody added that social media magnifies every mistake. “People think no one’s going to see their tweet,” he said. “Then it blows up. Everyone sees it. And suddenly, they’re done.”

Both students said they’ve learned to pause before posting. “If you’re angry, take a breath,” Jenna advised. “It’s not worth it.”

The Double Standard in Speech

Later, the discussion took a sharper turn. A Black student in the class brought up what she called “a double standard” around free speech and race.

“With the Charlie Kirk thing, people got fired,” she said. “But if a white person says the N-word, they just get canceled – and then bounce back.”

She recalled a viral case of a woman who called a nine-year-old boy the N-word. “She got fired,” the student said. “But then people raised a hundred thousand dollars for her. Like she was the victim.”

Her point was clear: some forms of hate speech are forgiven faster than others.

She continued, “Even in the Black community, people disagree about this. But I think people shouldn’t be saying the N-word, period. Especially if you’re not Black.”

She added something especially striking: “If someone says it casually, I take it more offensively than if they say it in anger. Because when you say it like it’s normal, that’s when it gets dangerous.”

Dr. Richards Pushes Back on Normalization

Dr. Richards thanked her for sharing and acknowledged the risk of normalization. “So you’re saying you’re worried the word’s losing its meaning,” he said. “That people are treating it like just another slang term?”

The student nodded. “Exactly. I’m from Houston. It’s diverse. But even there, I’ve seen kids throwing the N-word around like it’s funny. They think it’s just part of the language.”

Richards said he doubts the slur will ever become truly normalized, but he understood her concern. “You’re seeing a generation test limits,” he said. “It’s not right, but it’s what young people do.”

Her story, though, hit at something deeper – how language evolves, and how easily that evolution can erode empathy if we’re not paying attention.

Comparing the U.S. and Abroad

The conversation then turned global when Richards invited international students to compare America’s free speech culture to their own countries.

A student from China explained that many people there use VPNs to browse platforms like Twitter and Reddit – but on local apps such as Weibo, criticism of the government is strictly forbidden.

“You can post the news,” the student said. “But you can’t comment. You can’t say something about the government.”

Richards asked if people were aware they were being watched. The student answered, “Some people know and think it’s good – that it keeps things under control.”

That comment drew gasps from the class. Another student chimed in, saying the idea of government monitoring “is scary” but also fascinating. “It makes you think about how much we take freedom for granted here,” she said.

Would You Speak Differently If You Were Being Watched?

Dr. Richards asked a haunting question: How much would your life change if you were truly being monitored like that?

One student answered immediately, “A lot. I’d be scared to even message my friends.”

Another agreed, saying private conversations help shape personal beliefs. “If I couldn’t share my opinions with friends, I’d feel less intelligent,” she said. “You learn from talking — even from disagreement.”

Richards nodded. “So for you, the phone is an extension of your voice,” he said. “A place to express ideas.”

Their comments revealed a surprising truth: for many young people, freedom of speech isn’t about public protest – it’s about private conversation. The fear of losing that space hits deeper than censorship laws ever could.

A Generation Caught Between Courage and Caution

What made this discussion so powerful wasn’t the politics – it was the honesty.

These students weren’t reciting slogans about “free speech.” They were navigating it in real time, trying to understand where self-expression ends and responsibility begins.

Cody summed it up best when he said, “You’re protected under free speech, but your consequences aren’t.”

That line might sound simple, but it captures the balancing act every young American faces online: how to speak freely without ruining your life in the process.

Dr. Richards called it “the hardest tightrope this generation has ever walked.”

The Classroom as a Mirror of the Country

What makes Dr. Richards’ class remarkable is how it mirrors the national conversation outside the classroom walls.

Every topic – from cancel culture to race to government surveillance – feels like a reflection of debates raging on social media and cable news. Yet here, the tone is thoughtful, not combative.

What’s fascinating is how students naturally gravitate toward moderation. They value free speech, but they also value empathy. They recognize that words matter – but they don’t believe every mistake deserves exile.

The exchange about the N-word was especially revealing. It wasn’t about politics or punishment. It was about pain, pride, and the fear that younger generations may forget why certain words were taboo in the first place.

Dr. Richards’ classroom shows what’s still possible when people listen – really listen – to one another.

The Takeaway

So, when does free speech cross the line?

If this Penn State class is any indication, the answer depends on intent, impact, and awareness.

It’s not just what you say – it’s how you say it, and whether you’re willing to learn from the reaction.

Free speech is still alive on college campuses. But as Dr. Richards’ students made clear, it now comes with a silent asterisk: use it wisely.

UP NEXT: “Heavily Armed” — See Which States Are The Most Strapped

Americans have long debated the role of firearms, but one thing is sure — some states are far more armed than others.

See where your state ranks in this new report on firearm ownership across the U.S.